A review of three models of communication and group behaviour and Essay

A review of three presents of talk and group behaviour and their application to practice in a house room - Essay ExampleUsually, it is non only depended on the sender to depict the meaning of every communication, the receiver plays a major role in the out come of it. The message send by the sender may not be interpreted the same way it was intended. Hence communication or expression goes a great way towards determining how the expressions are interpreted. Flaw in communication or incomplete communication may affect the purpose of communication and can result in modify the consequences. Karl Popper said more or less this issue, it is impossible to speak in such(prenominal) a way that you cannot be misunderstood. Thus, strong communication is important in every walk of life be it professional, personal or social. non every whiz is able to express themselves and in this manner and the significance of communication should not be ignored. The communication mould includes the foll owing components sender, message, encoding, receiver, decoding and feedback. There are different models which describe the basic process of communication. All such models of communication aid to elucidate the kind of interaction and serve as a valid direction for illustrating the findings related to research (Narula, 2006). Such models are a tool by which researchers, practitioners, and students can demonstrate their ideas about what they believe to be the most essential features of communication. A brief appraisal of these communication models will foster to get a better understanding of their applicability in the crystalizeroom setting. The Transmission Model of talk is a highly acclaimed model of communication developed by Shannon and Weaver (1949). It is a model of communication which reduces message to a process that transmits information. The model includes five elements a source of information, the transmitter, a channel, receiver and a destination where the message arrive s (Flensburg, 2009). According to Daniel Chandler(2007) this model is not the best example for communication as it does not include a two way communication rather is based only on getting the message across to the receiver which can result in technical problem such as uncertainty of how accurately has the message been transmitted. Another problem which can be faced in this model of communication is the semantic error that means how precisely the meaning of the message is covered. Above all the problem, of forcefulness is really important the sender would not be able to confirm that how effectively the message has abnormal the behavior of the receiver. This model is definitely one of the simplest models of communication but it carries around the major issue of one way model. It brings uncertainty to the sender of the purpose of the communication being served or destroyed. The whole apprehension of communication revolves around the feedback which is a two-way communication model. If we analyze this model in a class room scenario, it is impossible for a teacher to give the lecture to students without knowing that whether her message has been understood by the students or not. She might even face the transmission error considering that the students are unable to understand her language. Chances of semantic error are very much possible in a classroom session as the teacher might be explaining to her level best